Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):290-291 (2003)
|Abstract||Predicates involved in language and reasoning are claimed to radically differ from categories applied to objects. Human predicates are the cognitive result of a contrast between perceived objects. Object recognition alone cannot generate such operations as modification and explicit negation. The mechanism studied by Hurford constitutes at best an evolutionary prerequisite of human predication ability.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Elizabeth Spelke, Recognition and Categorization of Biologically Significant Objects by Rhesus Monkeys (Macaca Mulatta): The Domain of Food.
Jessie Peissig & Michael J. Tarr, Visual Object Recognition: Do We Know More Now Than We Did 20 Years Ago?
Dale Jacquette (1989). Mally's Heresy and the Logic of Meinong's Object Theory. History and Philosophy of Logic 10 (1):1-14.
Yaroslav Shramko (1999). A Theory of Relevant Properties 1: Reflections and Definitions. Theoria 14 (1):63-81.
Phil Corkum (forthcoming). Aristotle on Predication. European Journal of Philosophy.
Uwe Meixner (2009). From Plato to Frege: Paradigms of Predication in the History of Ideas. Metaphysica 10 (2):199-214.
Glyn W. Humphreys & Emer M. E. Forde (2001). Hierarchies, Similarity, and Interactivity in Object Recognition: “Category-Specific” Neuropsychological Deficits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):453-476.
Terence V. Sewards & Mark A. Sewards (2002). On the Neural Correlates of Object Recognition Awareness: Relationship to Computational Activities and Activities Mediating Perceptual Awareness. Consciousness and Cognition 11 (1):51-77.
T. F. Morris (1984). The Proof of Pauline Self-Predication in the Phaedo. Philosophy Research Archives 10:139-151.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #122,991 of 549,037 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,037 )
How can I increase my downloads?