Ockham, suppositio , and modern logic
Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 5 (4):290-292 (1964)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesGraham Priest & Stephen Read (1980). Merely Confused Supposition. Franciscan Studies 40:265-97.
Gareth B. Matthews (1973). Suppositio and Quantification in Ockham. Noûs 7 (1):13-24.
Claude Panaccio & Ernesto Perini-Santos (2004). Guillaume d'Ockham Et la Suppositio Materialis. Vivarium 42 (2):202-224.
Pascal Massie (2004). Saving Contingency. Epoché 8 (2):333-350.
Stephen Chak Tornay (1938). Ockham: Studies and Selections. La Salle, Ill.,The Open Court Publishing Company.
F. Wade (1937). The Logic of William of Ockham. The Modern Schoolman 14 (4):93-93.
Gareth B. Matthews (1964). Ockham's Supposition Theory and Modern Logic. Philosophical Review 73 (1):91-99.
John N. Martin (2003). All Brutes Are Subhuman: Aristotle and Ockham on Private Negation. Synthese 134 (3):429 - 461.
L. M. De Rijk (1971). The Development of Suppositio Naturalis in Mediaeval Logic. Vivarium 9 (1):71-107.
Mary Sirridge (2009). Formalizing Medieval Logic: Suppositio, Consequentiae and Obligationes (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (3):pp. 469-470.
P. Garcia & F. Esteva (1995). On Ockham Algebras: Congruence Lattices and Subdirectly Irreducible Algebras. Studia Logica 55 (2):319 - 346.
William Ockham (1983). Predestination, Foreknowledge, and Future Contingents. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-24Total downloads11 ( #100,866 of 556,840 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,840 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
