Response to Martin De Nys

The Owl of Minerva 36 (2):165-174 (2005)
This is a response to issues raised by Martin De Nys in his article, “Conceiving Divine Transcendence,” dealing with Hegel’s God: A Counterfeit Double? The response focuses especially on the question of religious representation, the issue of the autonomy of philosophy, the issue of creation, the actual practice of Hegel in the Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion, and Hegel as a contemporary resource for philosophical theology
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 14,232
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
William Desmond (2005). Response to Peter Hodgson. The Owl of Minerva 36 (2):189-200.
Martin de Nys (1983). Hegel's Concept of God. The Owl of Minerva 15 (1):107-112.
Martin J. De Nys (2002). Faith, Self-Transcendence, and Reflection. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 51 (2):121-138.
Peter C. Hodgson (2005). Hegel's God. The Owl of Minerva 36 (2):153-163.
Martin J. de Nys (1989). God in History. Review of Metaphysics 43 (2):404-405.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

15 ( #161,941 of 1,699,702 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

8 ( #77,273 of 1,699,702 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.