Response to Peter Hodgson

The Owl of Minerva 36 (2):189-200 (2005)
Abstract
This is a response to issues raised by Peter Hodgson in his article “Hegel’s God: Counterfeit or Real?” dealing with Hegel’s God: A Counterfeit Double? The response focuses especially on Hodgson’s identification of Desmond’s view with that of Kierkegaard, on the question of whether Hegel is an agapeic thinker, and on the issue of the contemporary relevance of Hegel for theological reflection
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,772
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
William Desmond (2005). Response to Martin De Nys. The Owl of Minerva 36 (2):165-174.
Peter C. Hodgson (2005). Hegel's God. The Owl of Minerva 36 (2):153-163.
Peter C. Hodgson (2006). Hegel. The Owl of Minerva 37 (1):71-82.
Stephen Crites (2006). Hodgson's Choice. The Owl of Minerva 37 (1):57-70.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

Added to index

2012-03-18

Total downloads

1 ( #451,850 of 1,099,564 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #300,754 of 1,099,564 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.