Response to Peter Hodgson

The Owl of Minerva 36 (2):189-200 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a response to issues raised by Peter Hodgson in his article “Hegel’s God: Counterfeit or Real?” dealing with Hegel’s God: A Counterfeit Double? The response focuses especially on Hodgson’s identification of Desmond’s view with that of Kierkegaard, on the question of whether Hegel is an agapeic thinker, and on the issue of the contemporary relevance of Hegel for theological reflection.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response to Stephen Houlgate.William Desmond - 2005 - The Owl of Minerva 36 (2):175-188.
Response to Martin De Nys.William Desmond - 2005 - The Owl of Minerva 36 (2):165-174.
Hegel’s God.Peter C. Hodgson - 2005 - The Owl of Minerva 36 (2):153-163.
Hegel's Proofs of the Existence of God.Peter C. Hodgson - 2011 - In Stephen Houlgate & Michael Baur (eds.), A Companion to Hegel. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 414–429.
Hegel and Christian Theology.Peter Hodgson - 2006 - The Owl of Minerva 37 (1):1-7.
Hodgson’s Choice.Stephen Crites - 2006 - The Owl of Minerva 37 (1):57-70.
A Companion to Hegel.Peter C. Hodgson - 2011 - Wiley-Blackwell.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
61 (#236,715)

6 months
2 (#658,980)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William Desmond
Villanova University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references