Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||The notion of an automaton, as it is employed in the natural philosophy of Descartes and his closest followers, has three main components. None of them is new; what is new in early modern philosophy is the uses to which this old notion is put, and the idiosyncrasies into which its components are combined by subsequent philosophers. The thaumaturgic element is never entirely suppressed; but the more down-to-earth usage exempliﬁed in antiquity by Aristotle’s references predominates. The automaton is quite often the opposite of wonderful: phenomena that might excited wonder are proved to be unworthy of it, just by showing that they are the productions of an automaton. The automaton is, ﬁrst of all, a machine, and therefore an artifact, human or (if the metaphor becomes literal) divine. It offers a model of intelligibility—to use Peter Dear’s term—for a certain class of natural phenomena, namely those we ﬁnd in living things. But Descartes wants from it something more. In Descartes’ usage, a machine is that which makes itself available not just to “mechanical” explanation, but to a complete explanation, an explanation that makes all others superﬂuous. Not all machines, of course, are automata. Two further components ﬁgure in the notion. One is that automata are typically imitative. From the automata thaumata of Aristotle’s De Motu animalium to the nymphs of Salomon de Caus’s fountains, many automata are likenesses, partaking both of the iconic (to use Peirce’s term) and the symbolic. Moving sculptures proceed moving pictures by over two thousand years. They succeeded if they convinced their audiences that they could do what their prototypes did—where the doing is typically restricted to some few sorts of act. The wind-up mouse skitters across the ﬂoor like a real mouse; but it does not eat, nor does it seek the..|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Gerard ’T. Hooft (2013). Duality Between a Deterministic Cellular Automaton and a Bosonic Quantum Field Theory in 1+1 Dimensions. Foundations of Physics 43 (5):597-614.
Claude Lobry & Hervé Elmoznino (2000). Combinatorial Properties of Some Cellular Automata Related to the Mosaic Cycle Concept. Acta Biotheoretica 48 (3-4).
Stephen Philip Menn (2000). On Dennis Des Chene's. Perspectives on Science 8 (2).
David J. Chalmers (1996). Does a Rock Implement Every Finite-State Automaton? Synthese 108 (3):309-33.
Craig Martin (2010). The Ends of Weather: Teleology in Renaissance Meteorology. Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (3):259-282.
Emanuela Bianchi (2006). Material Vicissitudes and Technical Wonders: The Ambiguous Figure of Automaton in Aristotle's Metaphysics of Sexual Difference. Epoché 11 (1):109-139.
Hans Moravec, Robotics. Encyclopaedia Britannica Online.
Pete Mandik (2008). Cognitive Cellular Automata. In Complex Biological Systems:. Icfai University Press.
Geoffrey Gorham (2009). God and the Natural World in the Seventeenth Century: Space, Time, and Causality. Philosophy Compass 4 (5):859-872.
John Cottingham (ed.) (1998). Descartes. Oxford University Press.
Karsten Harries (1998). Descartes and the Labyrinth of the World. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 6 (3):307 – 330.
Added to index2011-07-12
Total downloads10 ( #114,762 of 755,289 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,372 of 755,289 )
How can I increase my downloads?