Teorema 25:197-210 (2006)
|Abstract||McDowell, responding to Mackie’s argument from queerness, defended realism about values by analogy to secondary qualities. A certain tension between two interpretations of McDowell’s response is highlighted. According to one, realism about values would indeed be vindicated, but at the cost of failing to provide an appropriate response to Mackie’s argument; whereas according to the other, McDowell does provide an adequate response, but evaluative realism is jeopardized.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Paul Fitzgerald (1982). Temporality, Secondary Qualities, and the Location of Sensations. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:293 - 303.
Douglas Lewis (1970). Some Problems of Perceptions. Philosophy of Science 37 (March):100-113.
John Corvino (2008). Hume and the Second-Quality Analogy. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 6 (2):157-173.
Emmett Holman (2006). Dualism and Secondary Quality Eliminativism. Philosophical Studies 128 (2):229--56.
Robert A. Wilson (forthcoming). Primary and Secondary Qualities. In Matthew Stuart (ed.), Blackwell Companion to Locke. Blackwell.
Robert B. Brandom (2002). Non-Inferential Knowledge, Perceptual Experience, and Secondary Qualities: Placing McDowell's Empiricism. In Reading McDowell: On Mind and World. New York: Routledge.
G. F. Stout (1903). Primary and Secondary Qualities. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 4:141-160.
John McDowell (1985). ``Values and Secondary Qualities&Quot. In Ted Honderich (ed.), Objectivity and Morality. London: Routledge.
John McDowell (1984). Values and Secondary Qualities. In Ted Honderich (ed.), Morality and Objectivity. Routledge.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads66 ( #13,603 of 549,006 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,160 of 549,006 )
How can I increase my downloads?