Philosophia Mathematica 3 (1):103-119 (1995)
|Abstract||Crispin Wright joins the ranks of those who have sought to refute mechanist theories of mind by invoking Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems. His predecessors include Gödel himself, J. R. Lucas and, most recently, Roger Penrose. The aim of this essay is to show that, like his predecessors, Wright, too, fails to make his case, and that, indeed, he fails to do so even when judged by standards of success which he himself lays down.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kathryn T. Gines (2012). "The Man Who Lived Underground": Jean-Paul Sartre And the Philosophical Legacy of Richard Wright. Sartre Studies International 17 (2):42-59.
Charles Sayward (2002). Is an Unpictorial Mathematical Platonism Possible? Journal of Philosophical Research 27:199-212.
Stewart Shapiro & Alan Weir (1999). New V, ZF and Abstractiont. Philosophia Mathematica 7 (3).
Tim Thornton (1997). Intention, Rule Following and the Strategic Role of Wright's Order of Determination Test. Philosophical Investigations 20 (2):136–151.
Bob Hale (1994). Dummett's Critique of Wright's Attempt to Resuscitate Frege. Philosophia Mathematica 2 (2):122-147.
Bob Hale (1999). On Some Arguments for the Necessity of Necessity. Mind 108 (429):23-52.
Luca Moretti (2012). Wright, Okasha and Chandler on Transmission Failure. Synthese 184 (3):217-234.
Jon Cogburn (2002). Logical Revision Re-Revisited: On the Wright/Salerno Case for Intuitionism. Philosophical Studies 110 (3):231--248.
Duncan Pritchard (2001). Scepticism and Dreaming. Philosophia 28 (1-4):373-390.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #67,622 of 549,198 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,198 )
How can I increase my downloads?