"Imperfect discretion": Interventions into the history of philosophy by twentieth-century French women philosophers
Hypatia 15 (2):160-180 (2000)
| Abstract | : How might we locate originality as emerging from within the "discrete" work of commentary? Because many women have engaged with philosophy in forms (including commentary) that preclude their work from being seen as properly "original," this question is a feminist issue. Via the work of selected contemporary French women philosophers, the author shows how commentary can reconfigure the philosophical tradition in innovative ways, as well as in ways that change what counts as philosophical innovation | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJacqueline Broad (2002). Women Philosophers of the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge University Press.
Joan E. Taylor (2003). Jewish Women Philosophers of First-Century Alexandria: Philo's "Therapeutae" Reconsidered. Oxford University Press.
Alan D. Schrift (2008). The Effects of the Agrégation de Philosophie on Twentieth-Century French Philosophy. Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (3):pp. 449-473.
Andrea Nye (1994). Philosophia: The Thought of Rosa Luxemburg, Simone Weil, and Hannah Arendt. Routledge.
Lilli Alanen & Charlotte Witt (eds.) (2004). Feminist Reflections on the History of Philosophy. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads6 ( #145,761 of 550,854 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 550,854 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
