In R. Penrose and CJ Isham, editors

In Roger Penrose & C. J. Isham (eds.), Quantum Concepts in Space and Time. New York ;Oxford University Press (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Remarks on Penrose’s “New Argument”.Per Lindström - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (3):231-237.
Reply to Isham.William Harper - 1998 - Faith and Philosophy 15 (2):223-228.
Impossible objects: A special type of visual illusion.Lionel S. Penrose & Roger Penrose - 1958 - British Journal of Psychology 49 (1):31-33.
Mechanism, truth, and Penrose's new argument.Stewart Shapiro - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (1):19-42.
Penrose's new argument.Per Lindström - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (3):241-250.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-31

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Time, quantum mechanics, and decoherence.Simon Saunders - 1995 - Synthese 102 (2):235 - 266.
Undermind.Steven Weinstein - 1996 - Synthese 106 (2):241 - 251.
A difficulty for Everett's many‐worlds theory.John Leslie - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (3):239 – 246.
Quantum mechanics and computation.Bart D’Hooghe & Jaroslaw Pykacz - 2004 - Foundations of Science 9 (4):387-404.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references