Taking science seriously
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science in the modern sense began with Galileo's conception of a law of nature: a universal statement about reality, expressed in unambiguous symbols and tested by what he aptly called 'ordeals' (we would call them crucial experiments). Ever since then, a recurrent theme in the history of science has been the tension between two great purposes that are implicit in Galileo's conception: science as a means of making predictions and giving us control of the world; and science as a means of understanding what the world is really like.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Sharon L. Crasnow (2001). Models and Reality: When Science Tackles Sex. Hypatia 16 (3):138-148.
Zvi Biener (2004). Galileo's First New Science: The Science of Matter. Perspectives on Science 12 (3):262-287.
Maja Horst (2011). Taking Our Own Medicine: On an Experiment in Science Communication. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):801-815.
Horace James Bridges (1928/1969). Taking the Name of Science in Vain. Freeport, N.Y.,Books for Libraries Press.
Neil Thomason (1994). Sherlock Holmes, Galileo, and the Missing History of Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:323 - 333.
Jan Marten Ivo Klaver (2008). The Galileo Case: Trial/Science/Truth. By Mario d'Addiothe Church and Galileo. (Studies in Science and the Humanities From the Reilly Center for Science Technology and Values) Ed. By Ernan mcmullinGalileo, Darwin, and Hawking: The Interplay of Science, Reason, and Religion. By Phil Dowe. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 49 (4):685–687.
James W. McAllister (1997). Laws of Nature, Natural History, and the Description of the World. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (3):245 – 258.
Roger Ariew (1986). Descartes as Critic of Galileo's Scientific Methodology. Synthese 67 (1):77 - 90.
Peter Dear (2006). The Intelligibility of Nature: How Science Makes Sense of the World. University of Chicago Press.
Added to index2009-10-25
Total downloads9 ( #163,591 of 1,100,077 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?