Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (4):1-22 (1999)
|Abstract||This paper assesses the claim that an agonistic model of democracy could foster greater accommodation of citizens' social, cultural and ethical differences than mainstream liberal theories. I address arguments in favor of agonistic conceptions of politics by a diverse group of democratic theorists, ranging from republican theorists - Hannah Arendt and Benjamin Barber - to postmodern democrats concerned with questions of identity and difference, such as William Connolly and Bonnie Honig. Neither Arendt's democratic agonism nor Barber's republican-inflected account of strong democracy purports to include citizens' group-based cultural identities, and so cannot further the claim that agonistic politics is more inclusive of cultural and social differences. Postmodern agonistic democrats such as Connolly and Honig rely upon Arendt's account of the relationship between agonism and pluralism, and wrongly assume that her view of politics is compatible with formal respect and recognition for citizens' cultural group identities. While agonistic democracy helpfully directs us to attend to the importance of moral and political disagreement, I argue that the stronger claim that an agonistic model of democracy could more readily include culturally diverse citizens is simply unfounded. By contrast, recent liberal variants of agonistic democracy that conceive of legal and political institutions as tools for recognizing and mediating citizens' moral and cultural differences may suggest ways to deepen our democratic practices in plural societies. Key Words: agonism agonistic democracy Hannah Arendt citizenship cultural minorities pluralism republican theory.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Keith Breen (2008). Agonism, Antagonism and the Necessity of Care. In Andrew Schaap (ed.), Law and Agonistic Politics. Ashgate Pub. Company.
Chantal Mouffe (1995). Politics, Democratic Action, and Solidarity. Inquiry 38 (1 & 2):99 – 108.
Hans Lindahl (2008). The Opening : Alegality and Political Agonism. In Andrew Schaap (ed.), Law and Agonistic Politics. Ashgate Pub. Company.
William E. Connolly (2007). William E. Connolly: Democracy, Pluralism & Political Theory. Routledge.
Andreas Kalyvas (2008). The Democratic Agonism of the Ancients Compared to That of the (Post)Moderns. In Andrew Schaap (ed.), Law and Agonistic Politics. Ashgate Pub. Company.
John S. Brady (2004). No Contest? Assessing the Agonistic Critiques of Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of the Public Sphere. Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (3):331-354.
Andrew Schaap (2006). Agonism in Divided Societies. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (2):255-277.
Thomas Fossen (2008). Agonistic Critiques of Liberalism: Perfection and Emancipation. Contemporary Political Theory 7 (4):376–394.
R. W. Glover (2012). Games Without Frontiers? Democratic Engagement, Agonistic Pluralism and the Question of Exclusion. Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (1):81-104.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads48 ( #26,525 of 722,873 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,873 )
How can I increase my downloads?