Completeness and indeterministic causation

Philosophy of Science 63 (3):184 (1996)
Abstract In The Chances of Explanation, Paul Humphreys presents a metaphysical analysis of causation. In this paper, I argue that this analysis is flawed. Humphreys' model of Causality incorporates three completeness requirements. I show that these completeness requirements, when applied in the world, force us to take causally irrelevant factors to be causally relevant. On this basis, I argue that Humphreys' analysis should be rejected
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,679
External links
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Eric Marcus (2001). Mental Causation. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1):57 - 83.
    Murali Ramachandran (2004). A Counterfactual Analysis of Indeterministic Causation. In J. Collins, E. J. Hall & L. A. Paul (eds.), Causation and Counterfactuals. MIT Press.
    Paul Humphreys (1980). Probabilistic Causality and Multiple Causation. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:25 - 37.
    Richard Otte (1986). Reichenbach, Causation, and Explanation. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:59 - 65.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2009-01-28

    Total downloads

    4 ( #178,675 of 549,088 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    0

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums