Empirical ethics and its alleged meta-ethical fallacies

Bioethics 23 (4):193-201 (2009)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords empirical ethics  fact‐value distinction  is‐ought problem  naturalistic fallacy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01710.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,865
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 21 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Abraham Rudnick (2001). A Meta-Ethical Critique of Care Ethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (6):505-517.
Harun Tepe (2007). Epistemological Dilemmas of Contemporary Ethics. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:25-30.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

16 ( #163,765 of 1,724,879 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #134,547 of 1,724,879 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.