David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (5):773-783 (1994)
We discuss in this paper the question of the scope of the principle of tolerance about languages promoted in Carnap's The Logical Syntax of Language and the nature of the analogy between it and the rudimentary conventionalism purportedly exhibited in the work of Poincaré and Hilbert. We take it more or less for granted that Poincaré and Hilbert do argue for conventionalism. We begin by sketching Coffa's historical account, which suggests that tolerance be interpreted as a conventionalism that allows us complete freedom to select whatever language we wish—an interpretation that generalizes the conventionalism promoted by Poincaré and Hilbert which allows us complete freedom to select whatever axiom system we wish for geometry. We argue that such an interpretation saddles Carnap with a theory of meaning that has unhappy consequences, a theory we believe he did not hold. We suggest that the principle of linguistic tolerance in fact has a more limited scope; but within that scope the analogy between tolerance and geometric conventionalism is quite tight
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Rudolf Carnap (1937). The Logical Syntax of Language. London, K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd..
Alberto Coffa (1986). From Geometry to Tolerance: Sources of Conventionalism in Nineteenth-Century Geometry. In Robert G. Colodny (ed.), From Quarks to Quasars: Philosophical Problems of Modern Physics. University of Pittsburgh Press. 7--3.
William Demopoulos (1994). Frege, Hilbert, and the Conceptual Structure of Model Theory. History and Philosophy of Logic 15 (2):211-225.
Michael Friedman (1991). The Re-Evaluation of Logical Positivism. Journal of Philosophy 88 (10):505-519.
Micheal Friedman (1983). Foundations of Space-Time Theories. Princeton University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Matthew C. Haug (2014). On the Prospects for Ontology: Deflationism, Pluralism, and Carnap's Principle of Tolerance. European Journal of Philosophy 22 (4):593-616.
Robert Hudson (2010). Carnap, the Principle of Tolerance, and Empiricism. Philosophy of Science 77 (3):341-358.
Thomas Oberdan (2005). Carnap's Conventionalism: The Problem with P-Rules. Grazer Philosophische Studien 68 (1):119-137.
Bryan G. Norton (1977). On the Metatheoretical Nature of Carnap's Philosophy. Philosophy of Science 44 (1):65-85.
Robert G. Hudson (2008). Carnap's Empiricism, Lost and Found. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 43:81-88.
Yemima Ben-menahem (2005). Black, White and Gray: Quine on Convention. Synthese 146 (3):245 - 282.
Yemima Ben-Menahem (2006). Conventionalism. Cambridge University Press.
Thomas Mormann (2005). Carnap's Metrical Conventionalism Versus Differential Topology. Proc. 2004 Biennial Meeting of the PSA, vol. I, Contributed Papers 72 (5):814 - 825.
Gregory Lavers (2008). Carnap, Formalism, and Informal Rigour. Philosophia Mathematica 16 (1):4-24.
S. Awodey & A. W. Carus (2007). Carnap's Dream: Gödel, Wittgenstein, and Logical, Syntax. Synthese 159 (1):23-45.
Norma yunez-naude (2003). What is Carnap's Conventionalism After All? Synthese 137 (1-2):261 - 272.
Paolo Dau (1985). Ideal Languages and Carnap's Principle of Tolerance. International Studies in Philosophy 17 (3):15-31.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads72 ( #28,937 of 1,696,592 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,146 of 1,696,592 )
How can I increase my downloads?