Is Sellars'a Rylean Hypothesis Plausible? A Dialogue

In The Self-Correcting Enterprise: Essays on Wilfrid Sellars (2006)
Abstract A dialogue between someone who finds Sellars's Rylean myth in "Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind" quite implausible and another who defends it.
Keywords Philosophy of Mind  Knowledge of mind
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,709
External links This entry has no external links. Add one.
Through your library Configure

Similar books and articles
Ernest Sosa (2003). Are There Two Grades of Knowledge? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):113–130.
Michael Williams (2003). Are There Two Grades of Knowledge? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):91–112.
John McDowell (2009). Why is Sellars's Essay Called "Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind"? In Willem A. DeVries (ed.), Empiricism, Perceptual Knowledge, Normativity, and Realism: Essays on Wilfrid Sellars. Oxford University Press.
Timm Triplett & Willem A. DeVries (2006). Is Sellars's Rylean Hypothesis Plausible? A Dialogue. In Michael P. Wolf & Mark Norris Lance (eds.), The Self-Correcting Enterprise: Essays on Wilfrid Sellars. Rodopi.

Analytics

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

Added to index

2010-03-30

Total downloads

0

Recent downloads (6 months)

0

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums