David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Calicut University Research Journal, ISSN No. 09723348 (1):47-58 (2009)
This paper attempts to articulate certain inadequacies that are involved in the traditional way of categorizing Indian philosophy and explores alternative approaches, some of which otherwise are not explicitly seen in the treatises of the history of Indian Philosophies. By categorization, I mean, classifying Indian philosophy into two streams, which are traditionally called as astica and nastica or orthodox and heterodox systems. Further, these different schools in the astica Darsanas and nastica Darsanas are usually numbered into six and three respectively. Nyaya - Vaisesika, Sankhya -Yoga and Purva & Uttara Mimamsa are identified as astica darsanas and Carvaka, Buddhism and Jainism are identified as nastica darsanas (6+3). It is my endeavor to critically analyze the usual astica-nastica distinction of 6+3 classification of Indian philosophy so as to find out the meaning of such a rationale in this categorization. This general consensus is contested in this paper. What I am intended to support and strengthen such a critical analysis and exploration is to discuss these systems of India’s philosophy within the general intellectual milieu of Indian cultural traditions, its orientations, presuppositions and preferences. In order to carry out such a task, I shall be taking recourse to the theories of different scholars, both traditional and modern, in approaching and appropriating Indian Philosophy from different perspectives and their critical-creative approaches shall be scrutinized.
|Keywords||Indian Philosophy, Orthodox and Heterodox Schools Limitations and Alternatives|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Daya Krishna (1991). Indian Philosophy: A Counter Perspective. Oxford University Press.
Shyam Ranganathan (2007). Ethics and the History of Indian Philosophy. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.
Roy W. Perrett (1998). Truth, Relativism and Western Conceptions of Indian Philosophy. Asian Philosophy 8 (1):19 – 29.
S. N. Ghoshal (1978). Elements of Indian Aesthetics. Chaukhambha Orientalia.
Balaganapathi Devarakonda (2008). Dana: A Foundation of the Indian Social Life. In Sebastian Vt & Geeta Manakatala (eds.), Foundations of Indian Life: Cultural, Religious and Aesthetic Edited by ISBN. 1439201854. Booksurge.
G. S. Brett (1934). Book Review:A History of Indian Philosophy. Surendranath Dasgupta; Indian Idealism. Surendranath Dasgupta; Outlines of Indian Philosophy. M. Hiriyanna; History of Indian Philosophy. Vol. VII. Indian Mysticism. S. K. Belvalkar, R. D. Ranade. [REVIEW] Ethics 45 (1):102.
Sue Hamilton (2001). Indian Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Shri Krishna Saksena (1970). Essays on Indian Philosophy. Honolulu,University of Hawaii Press.
Himal Trikha (2012). Competing World Views: Perspectivism and Polemics in the Satya-Śāsana-Parīkṣā and Other Jaina Works. [REVIEW] Journal of Indian Philosophy 40 (1):25-45.
Shayne Clarke (2009). Locating Humour in Indian Buddhist Monastic Law Codes: A Comparative Approach. [REVIEW] Journal of Indian Philosophy 37 (4):311-330.
Balaganapathi Devarakonda (2008-09). The Argumentative Tradition in Indian Philosophy. Journal of Philosophy, Culture and Traditions 5:173-186.
Added to index2012-04-10
Total downloads6 ( #213,996 of 1,101,834 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #191,964 of 1,101,834 )
How can I increase my downloads?