David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Johns Hopkins University Press (2005)
What, at this historical moment "after Auschwitz," still remains of the questions traditionally asked by theology? What now is theology's minimal degree? This magisterial study, the first extended comparison of the writings of Theodor W. Adorno and Emmanuel Levinas, explores remnants and echoes of religious forms in these thinkers' critiques of secular reason, finding in the work of both a "theology in pianissimo" constituted by the trace of a transcendent other. The author analyzes, systematizes, and formalizes this idea of an other of reason. In addition, he frames these thinkers' innovative projects within the arguments of such intellectual heirs as Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida, defending their work against later accusations of "performative contradiction" (by Habermas) or "empiricism" (by Derrida) and in the process casting important new light on those later writers as well. Attentive to rhetorical and rational features of Adorno's and Levinas's texts, his investigations of the concepts of history, subjectivity, and language in their writings provide a radical interpretation of their paradoxical modes of thought and reveal remarkable and hitherto unsuspected parallels between their philosophical methods, parallels that amount to a plausible way of overcoming certain impasses in contemporary philosophical thinking. In Adorno, this takes the form of a dialectical critique of dialectics in Levinas, that of a phenomenological critique of phenomenology, each of which sheds new light on ancient and modern questions of metaphysics, ethics, and aesthetics. For the English-language publication, the author has extensively revised and updated the prize-winning German version.
|Keywords||Philosophical theology Rationalism Deconstruction Dialectic Transcendence (Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$30.00 used (58% off) $53.88 new (25% off) $59.38 direct from Amazon (17% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||BT40.V7513 2005|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Michael Purcell (2010). IJPR: Beyond the Limit and Limiting the Beyond. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 68 (1):121-138.
Campbell Jones (2007). Editorial Introduction. Business Ethics 16 (3):196–202.
Agata Bielik-Robson (2011). Another Conversion. Stanisław Brzozowski's 'Diary' as an Early Instance of the Post-Secular Turn to Religion. Studies in East European Thought 63 (4):279-291.
Similar books and articles
Thomas Rentsch (1996). Die Negativität der Sprache. Bemerkungen zu Adorno und Wittgenstein. Wittgenstein-Studien 3 (1).
Brian O'Connor (1998). Adorno, Heidegger and the Critique of Epistemology. Philosophy and Social Criticism 24 (4):43-62.
Nick Smith (2008). Questions for a Reluctant Jurisprudence of Alterity. In Desmond Manderson (ed.), Essays on Levinas and Law: A Mosaic. Palgrave Macmillan.
Barr Clingan & P. Nicolaas (2011). Hent de Vries and the Other of Reason. The European Legacy 15 (5):549-563.
Carl Sachs (2011). The Acknowledgement of Transcendence: Anti-Theodicy in Adorno and Levinas. Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (3):273-294.
Asher Howoritz (2002). 'By a Hair's Breadth': Critique, Transcendence and the Ethical in Adorno and Levinas. Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (2).
Nick Smith (2007). Adorno Vs. Levinas: Evaluating Points of Contention. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 40 (3):275-306.
Espen Hammer (2000). Adorno and Extreme Evil. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (4):75-93.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #103,904 of 1,696,625 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #250,163 of 1,696,625 )
How can I increase my downloads?