The Charm of Disenchantment: A Quest for the Intellectual Attraction of Secularization Theory [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sophia 49 (3):407-428 (2010)
In the course of Western history, philosophy has proven to be an active participant in the process of secularization. This article seeks to examine that philosophical role more closely. The central question is how the role of philosophy must be rethought in light of the contemporary critique of classical secularization theory. The first part of the article sheds light on the current crisis of secularization theory. Drawing on recent scholarship in the social sciences, it explains why the classical tenets and assumptions of secularization theory are no longer being considered as plausible and empirically grounded hypotheses. Against that background, the second part turns to philosophy. It examines the implications for a philosophical tradition of religious criticism that has consciously operated within this once-undisputed model of secularization. The question is how this critique of religion must be rethought, if its prominent role in the history of modern philosophy can no longer be ascribed to a general secularization of the Western mind. The third and final part attempts to answer this question by focusing on one of the most frequently overlooked, yet most significant and crucial elements in the history of philosophical secularization: the intrinsic intellectual attraction of religious disenchantment
|Keywords||Secularization Disenchantment Religion Critique of religion Philosophy of history Enlightenment|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jeffrey E. Green (2005). Two Meanings of Disenchantment. Philosophy and Theology 17 (1-2):51-84.
Hans Joas (2010). The Contingency of Secularization : Reflections on the Problem of Secularization in the Work of Reinhart Koselleck. In The Benefit of Broad Horizons: Intellectual and Institutional Preconditions for a Global Social Science: Festschrift for Bjorn Wittrock on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday. Brill 24--87.
M. S. Kempshall (1999). The Common Good in Late Medieval Political Thought. Oxford University Press.
Jeffrey Andrew Barash (1998). The Sense of History: On the Political Implications of Karl Löwith's Concept of Secularization. History and Theory 37 (1):69–82.
María Pía Lara (2003). In and Out of Terror: The Vertigo of Secularization. Hypatia 18 (1):183 - 196.
G. Trompf (1982). Book Reviews : A General Theory of Secularization. By David Martin. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1978. Pp. Ix + 353. 10.00. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 12 (3):335-336.
Kathleen Davis (2010). The Sense of an Epoch : Periodization, Sovereignty, and the Limits of Secularization. In Andrew Cole & D. Vance Smith (eds.), The Legitimacy of the Middle Ages: On the Unwritten History of Theory. Duke University Press
Ze’Ev Levy (2005). Emmanuel Levinas on Secularization in Modern Society. Levinas Studies 1:19-35.
Jeffrey E. Green (2005). Two Meanings of Disenchantment: Sociological Condition Vs. Philosophical Act—Reassessing Max Weber's Thesis of the Disenchantment of the World. Philosophy and Theology 17 (1/2):51-84.
Added to index2010-06-09
Total downloads35 ( #119,250 of 1,911,805 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #181,474 of 1,911,805 )
How can I increase my downloads?