Journal of Philosophy 42 (September):515-530 (1945)
|Abstract||Professor [H.W.] Sheldon's critique of contemporary naturalism as professed in the volume Naturalism and the Human Spirit consists of one central "accusation": naturalism is materialism pure and simple. This charge is supported by his further claim that since the scientific method naturalists espouse for acquiring reliable knowledge of nature is incapable of yielding knowledge of the mental or spiritual "nature" for the naturalist is definitionally limited to "physical nature." He therefore concludes that instead of being a philosophy which can settle age-old conflicts between materialism and idealism, naturalism is no more than a partisan standpoint, and contributes no new philosophical synthesis. ...|
|Keywords||Dualism Materialism Metaphysics Naturalism Scientific Method Sheldon, W|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert Audi (2000). Philosophical Naturalism at the Turn of the Century. Journal of Philosophical Research 25:27-45.
Sidney Hook (1961/1971). The Quest for Being, and Other Studies in Naturalism and Humanism. Westport, Conn.,Greenwood Press.
W. Donald Oliver (1949). Can Naturalism Be Materialistic? Journal of Philosophy 46 (September):608-614.
Jaegwon Kim (2003). The American Origins of Philosophical Naturalism. Journal of Philosophical Research 28:83-98.
David Papineau, Naturalism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Harry Ruja (1957). Are Naturalists Materialists? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 17 (June):555-557.
Arthur E. Falk (2007). What Divides Us Today. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 7:45-49.
W. H. Sheldon (1946). Are Naturalists Materialists? Journal of Philosophy 43 (April):197-209.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads48 ( #22,894 of 556,909 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #11,176 of 556,909 )
How can I increase my downloads?