|Abstract||Most philosophers in the analytical philosophy answer the question what personal identity is in psychological terms. Arguments for substantiating this view are mainly based on thought experiments of brain transfer cases and the like in which persons change brains. However, in these thought experiments the remaining part of the body plays only a passive part. In this paper I argue that the psychological approach of personal identity cannot be maintained, if the whole body is actively involved in the analysis, and that the body is an intrinsic part of what I am as a person.|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Elizabeth Schechter (2009). Persons and Psychological Frameworks: A Critique of Tye. Journal of Consciousness Studies 16 (2-3):141-163.
Lynne Rudder Baker (1999). What Am I? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (1):151-159.
Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) (2005). Personal Identity. Cambridge University Press.
Trenton Merricks (1999). Endurance, Psychological Continuity, and the Importance of Personal Identity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (4):983-997.
David Braddon-Mitchell, Kristie Miller & Braddon-Mitchell (2004). How to Be a Conventional Person. The Monist 87 (4):457-474.
James Baillie (1997). Personal Identity and Mental Content. Philosophical Psychology 10 (3):323-33.
Christopher Buford (2009). Baker on the Psychological Account of Personal Identity. Acta Analytica 24 (3):197-209.
E. Furberg (2012). Advance Directives and Personal Identity: What Is the Problem? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):60-73.
Marya Schechtman (2001). Empathic Access: The Missing Ingredient in Personal Identity. Philosophical Explorations 4 (2):95 – 111.
Added to index2009-12-05
Total downloads60 ( #15,931 of 549,010 )
Recent downloads (6 months)19 ( #2,986 of 549,010 )
How can I increase my downloads?