David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Faith and Philosophy 21 (2):214-227 (2004)
This paper compares Aristotle’s and Aquinas’s accounts of the virtue of magnanimity specifically as a corrective to the vice of pusillanimity. After definingpusillanimity and underscoring key features of Aristotelian magnanimity, I explain how Aquinas’s account of Christian magnanimity, by making humandependence on God fundamental to this virtue, not only clarifies the differences between the vice of pusillanimity and the virtue of humility, but also showswhy only Christian magnanimity can free us from improper and damaging forms of dependence on the opinions and standards of others, enabling us toavoid the moral pitfalls of both pusillanimity and presumption
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Andrew Pinsent (2012). The Second-Person Perspective in Aquinas's Ethics: Virtues and Gifts. Routledge.
Angela McKay Knobel (2010). Two Theories of Christian Virtue. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84 (3):599-618.
Thomas (2005). Thomas Aquinas: Disputed Questions on the Virtues. Cambridge University Press.
Eleonore Stump (2011). The Non-Aristotelian Character of Aquinas's Ethics. Faith and Philosophy 28 (1):29-43.
Ryan Patrick Hanley (2009). Adam Smith and the Character of Virtue. Cambridge University Press.
Jeffrey Hause (2007). Aquinas on the Function of Moral Virtue. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (1):1-20.
John Inglis (1999). Aquinas's Replication of the Acquired Moral Virtues: Rethinking the Standard Philosophical Interpretation of Moral Virtue in Aquinas. Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (1):3 - 27.
Eugene F. Rogers Jr (1999). Aquinas on Natural Law and the Virtues in Biblical Context: Homosexuality as a Test Case. Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (1):29 - 56.
David A. Horner (1998). What It Takes to Be Great. Faith and Philosophy 15 (4):415-444.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #121,117 of 1,696,514 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #93,751 of 1,696,514 )
How can I increase my downloads?