Berkeley on Space, Sight and Touch
Philosophy 53 (203):102- (1978)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRobert Hopkins (2011). Re-Imagining, Re-Viewing and Re-Touching. In Fiona McPherson (ed.), The senses: classic and contemporary philosophical perspectives.
John Campbell (2005). Information-Processing, Phenomenal Consciousness and Molyneux's Question. In José Luis Bermúdez (ed.), Thought, Reference, and Experience: Themes From the Philosophy of Gareth Evans. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
G. M. Stratton (1899). The Spatial Harmony of Touch and Sight. Mind 8 (32):492-505.
Robert Hopkins (2000). Touching Pictures. British Journal of Aesthetics 40 (1):149-167.
Michael Martin (1992). Sight and Touch. In Tim Crane (ed.), The Contents of Experience. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Joseph John Murphy (1876). Space Through Sight and Touch. Mind 1 (2):284-285.
Joseph John Murphy (1876). Space Through Sight and Touch. Mind 1 (2):284-285.
Tom Stoneham (2011). Catching Berkeley's Shadow. Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (2):116-136.
A. D. Smith (2000). Space and Sight. Mind 109 (435):481-518.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads6 ( #145,458 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
