David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (2):221-238 (2001)
The role of scientific theories in classifying plants and animals is traced from Hennig's phylogenetics and the evolutionary taxonomy of Simpson and Mayr, through numerical phenetics, to present-day cladistics. Hennig limited biological classification to sister groups so that this one relation can be expressed unambiguously in classifications. Simpson and Mayr were willing to sacrifice precision in representation in order to include additional features of evolution in the construction of classifications. In order to make classifications more objective, precise and quantitative, numerical pheneticists limited themselves to representing degrees of phenetic similarity. Finally, present-day cladists can be separated into phylogenetic cladists, who retain much of Hennig's theory of classification, and pattern cladists, who have stripped Hennig's system down to its bare essentials
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Makmiller Pedroso (2012). Essentialism, History, and Biological Taxa. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 43 (1):182-190.
Similar books and articles
L. D. (2001). The Role of Theories in Biological Systematics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (2):221-238.
Frederic Tremblay (2013). Nicolai Hartmann and the Metaphysical Foundation of Phylogenetic Systematics. Biological Theory 7 (1):56-68.
Christopher D. Horvath (1997). Some Questions About Identifying Individuals: Failed Intuitions About Organisms and Species. Philosophy of Science 64 (4):654-668.
Massimo Pigliucci (2012). On the Different Ways of ‘‘Doing Theory’’ in Biology. Biological Theory 7 (4):DOI 10.1007/s13752-012-0047-1.
Joel Hagen (2003). The Statistical Frame of Mind in Systematic Biology From "Quantitative Zoology to Biometry". Journal of the History of Biology 36 (2):353 - 384.
David L. Hull (2002). Recent Philosophy of Biology: A Review. Acta Biotheoretica 50 (2):117-128.
Richard Richards (2003). Character Individuation in Phylogenetic Inference. Philosophy of Science 70 (2):264-279.
Fang Zhao-hui & David R. Schiller (2002). A Critical Reflection on the Systematics of Traditional Chinese Learning. Philosophy East and West 52 (1):36-49.
W. M. Kruseman (1949). Gradation of Language in Biological Systematics. Synthese 8 (1):175 - 181.
Graham C. D. Griffiths (1974). On the Foundations of Biological Systematics. Acta Biotheoretica 23 (3-4):85-131.
Kevin De Queiroz (1988). Systematics and the Darwinian Revolution. Philosophy of Science 55 (2):238 - 259.
Michael Bradie (1990). The Evolution of Scientific Lineages. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:245 - 254.
David B. Kitts (1983). The Complexity of Living Bodies and the Structure of Biological Theories. Acta Biotheoretica 32 (3):195-205.
David L. Hull (2006). The Essence of Scientific Theories. Biological Theory 1 (1):17-19.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads4 ( #370,781 of 1,696,592 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,146 of 1,696,592 )
How can I increase my downloads?