David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (2):191-206 (2009)
The puzzle: why do so many economists in principle acknowledge the importance of creative destruction, and yet in practice give so little attention to creative destruction in what they teach and what they research? The answer lies, in part, in the difficulty of obtaining what is viewed as ?hard? evidence in support of some of the central claims. For example, one such claim is that new products contribute more to consumer well-being than price competition on old products. The only kind of evidence accepted by much of the profession is the testing of econometric hypotheses generated from formal models. The sort of evidence found in persuasive sources such as DeLong's ?Cornucopia? consists of historical examples and raw time series. I argue that in the short run, a more pluralistic methodology would be better, and that in the long run, we should seek to understand which methods work best under which circumstances.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Milton Friedman (1953). Essays in Positive Economics. University of Chicago Press.
Arthur Donovan, Larry Laudan, Rachel Laudan & John Preston (1994). Scrutinizing Science: Empirical Studies of Scientific Change. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (4):1063-1065.
Larry Laudan, Arthur Donovan, Rachel Laudan, Peter Barker, Harold Brown, Jarrett Leplin, Paul Thagard & Steve Wykstra (1986). Scientific Change: Philosophical Models and Historical Research. Synthese 69 (2):141 - 223.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jonathan E. Adler (1997). Constrained Belief and the Reactive Attitudes. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (4):891-905.
Imogen Dickie (2011). How Proper Names Refer. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (1pt1):43-78.
Friedel Weinert (1991). Introducing Events, Successful Reference and Reference-Fixing. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 22 (1):155-167.
Robert Weissberg (1996). The Real Marketplace of Ideas. Critical Review 10 (1):107-121.
John Forge (2007). What Are the Moral Limits of Weapons Research? Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (1):76-87.
David E. W. Fenner (2008). Formalism and the Consumable Arts. Journal of Philosophical Research 33:127-141.
Brian J. Scholl & Daniel J. Simons (2001). Change Blindness, Gibson, and the Sensorimotor Theory of Vision. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):1004-1006.
Tone Kvernbekk (2011). The Concept of Evidence in Evidence-Based Practice. Educational Theory 61 (5):515-532.
Paul McIntosh (2010). Action Research and Reflective Practice: Creative and Visual Methods to Facilitate Reflection and Learning. Routledge.
Joan E. E. Sieber (2005). Evidence-Based Ethical Problem Solving: An Idea Whose Time has Come. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 3 (2-4):113-125.
Robert Nola (1980). Fixing the Reference of Theoretical Terms. Philosophy of Science 47 (4):505-531.
Michael Hodges (1980). Means/Ends and the Nature of Engineering. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:456 - 463.
Kevin M. Cahill (2008). Elucidation, Meta-Philosophy, and Hacker's Use of “External Evidence”. Journal of Philosophical Research 33:73-99.
Kristin Andrews (2011). Beyond Anthropomorphism: Attributing Psychological Properties to Animals. In Tom L. Beauchamp R. G. Frey (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics. Oxford University Press 469--494.
Added to index2012-02-20
Total downloads12 ( #280,480 of 1,793,273 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #137,980 of 1,793,273 )
How can I increase my downloads?