David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Medical Humanities 32 (1):38-42 (2006)
There is a growing trend in obstetric medicine of prenatal diagnosis and the selective abortion of foetuses that are likely to be born with a disability. Reasons commonly given to explain this trend include the financial implications of screening and testing policies, the disruption to families caused by the birth of a child with a disability, and the potential quality of life of the unborn child. This paper reflects upon another possible reason for this. It is argued that it is, in part, a consequence of our attitudes towards disability and a pursuit of aesthetic perfection. These attitudes arise from a social context that may be explained by considering the effect on the disabled community of the transition from modernity to postmodernity. This shift is demonstrated by inspecting some of the synonymous developments in art history. It is suggested that this “cultural turn” may have both helped and hindered people with disabilities, but the hypothesis requires further testing. This could be best achieved with a qualitative study of what motivates parental decision making in the obstetric unit
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
David F. Walbert (1973). Abortion, Society, and the Law. Cleveland [Ohio]Press of Case Western Reserve University.
Carolyn Gonter, The Expressivist Argument, Prenatal Diagnosis, and Selective Abortion: An Appeal to the Social Construction of Disability.
Diana Buccafurni & Pepe Lee Chang (2009). Does Prenatal Diagnosis Morally Require Provision of Selective Abortion? American Journal of Bioethics 9 (8):65-67.
Angus Clarke (2002). Clinical Ethical Reflections on Prenatal Diagnosis and Selective Abortion / Carlo Loots. Responsibility in Genetic Testing: Shared or Divided Between Professionals and Clients? In Chris Gastmans (ed.), Between Technology and Humanity: The Impact of Technology on Health Care Ethics. Leuven University Press
Michael J. Selgelid (2003). Ethics and Eugenic Enhancement. Poiesis and Praxis 1 (4):239-261.
Hans-Martin Sass (1992). Right Not to Know or Duty to Know? Prenatal Screening for Polycystic Renal Disease. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (4):395-405.
Gail Weiss (1995). Sex-Selective Abortion: A Relational Approach. Hypatia 10 (1):202 - 217.
J. Arlebrink (1997). The Moral Roots of Prenatal Diagnosis. Ethical Aspects of the Early Introduction and Presentation of Prenatal Diagnosis in Sweden. Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (4):260-261.
Zoltan Papp (1989). Genetic Counseling and Termination of Pregnancy in Hungary. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (3):323-333.
James Lindemann Nelson (2000). Prenatal Diagnosis, Personal Identity, and Disability. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (3):213-228.
Ari Zivotofsky & Alan Jotkowitz (2009). Prenatal Diagnosis and Abortion Are Not in Conflict in Israel. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (8):58-60.
Daniel Sperling (2009). From Iran to Latin America: Must Prenatal Diagnosis Necessarily Be Provided With Abortion for Congenital Abnormalities? American Journal of Bioethics 9 (8):61-63.
Elisabeth Hildt (2002). Autonomy and Freedom of Choice in Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (1):65-72.
Jeff McMahan (2006). Paradoxes of Abortion and Prenatal Injury. Ethics 116 (4):625-655.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads18 ( #151,097 of 1,725,865 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #268,283 of 1,725,865 )
How can I increase my downloads?