David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sophia 48 (3):267-279 (2009)
With almost a century of historical distance between Heidegger’s retrieval of the question of being and contemporary concern about the Other, we have accrued invaluable experiences for critical leverage about what it is to ask one another questions. I offer a sketch aimed at adapting Tillich’s theological system grounded in existential questioning to today by juxtaposing him with Levinas’ philosophical ethics. Tillich and Levinas provide motive for reflection on the topic of questioning in particular. In the case of Tillich, questions constitute a crucial moment in the dialogue between our contemporary existential situation and religious symbols, or in what he called the ‘method of correlation.’ Furthermore, Tillich locates in the very structure of questioning the germ of our participation in our essential nature despite existential disruption. Beneath his more provocative and prophetic discourse on the absolute desolation and height of the Other, Levinas sees in questions a different kind of possibility. It is not our essential and existential selves, but oneself and the absolutely Other who come together in the question yet retain their infinite difference. Heidegger is the immediate predecessor from whom both Tillich and Levinas inherit a predilection for reflection on questioning. What is at stake is not merely the legacy of Heidegger’s construal of questioning, but, more importantly here, the fundamental sources Tillich and Levinas posit as the origin of our questioning.
|Keywords||Tillich Levinas Heidegger Questioning Dialogue|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Theodor W. Adorno (1973). The Jargon of Authenticity. Evanston, Ill.,Northwestern University Press.
Leora Faye Batnitzky (2006). Leo Strauss and Emmanuel Levinas: Philosophy and the Politics of Revelation. Cambridge University Press.
Martin Bell (1975). Questioning. Philosophical Quarterly 25 (100):193-212.
Roland Paul Blum (1983). Emmanuel Levinas' Theory of Commitment. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 44 (2):145-168.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Daniel J. Peterson (2006). Jacob Boehme and Paul Tillich: A Reassessment of the Mystical Philosopher and Systematic Theologian. Religious Studies 42 (2):225-234.
Charles S. McCoy (1995). The Postcritical and Fiduciary Dimension in Polanyi and Tillich. Tradition and Discovery 22 (1):5-10.
Dirk-martin Grube (1997). A Critical Reconstruction of Paul Tillich's Epistemology. Religious Studies 33 (1):67-80.
Tyler Tritten (2011). First Philosophy and the Religious. Philosophy and Theology 23 (1):29-52.
Richard Gelwick (1995). The Polanyi-Tillich Dialogue Of 1963. Tradition and Discovery 22 (1):11-19.
Bob Plant (2006). Apologies: Levinas and Dialogue. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (1):79 – 94.
Peter Gratton (2005). Heidegger and Levinas on the Question of Temporality. Journal of Philosophical Research 30:157-168.
Drew M. Dalton (2009). Otherwise Than Nothing. Philosophy and Theology 21 (1/2):105-128.
Terence M. O'Keeffe (1982). The Metaethics of Paul Tillich: Further Reflections. Journal of Religious Ethics 10 (1):135 - 143.
Rudi Visker (2008). The Inhuman Condition: Looking for Difference After Levinas and Heidegger. Duquesne University Press.
Added to index2009-08-22
Total downloads43 ( #45,114 of 1,413,281 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #154,925 of 1,413,281 )
How can I increase my downloads?