David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Quarterly 56 (225):517–535 (2006)
I have previously argued that within an argument to show that we cannot perceive the causes of our sensations, Berkeley's Philonous conflates a psychological and an epistemic sense of 'immediately perceive', and uses the principle of perceptual immediacy (PPI), that whatever is perceived by the senses is immediately perceived. George Pappas has objected that Berkeley does not operate with either of these concepts of immediate perception, and does not subscribe to (PPI). But I show that Berkeley's argumentative strategy requires him to use these two concepts, and that the concept of immediate perception Pappas attributes to Berkeley would weaken this strategy. I also defend attributing to Berkeley a slightly modified version of (PPI), on which it both serves his strategy and allows sense perception to incorporate what he calls 'suggestion'
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Georges Dicker (1977). Primary and Secondary Qualities: A Proposed Modification of the Lockean Account. Southern Journal of Philosophy 15 (4):457-471.
Georges Dicker (2001). Berkeley on the Impossibility of Abstracting Primary From Secondary Qualities: Lockean Rejoinders. Southern Journal of Philosophy 39 (1):23-45.
Citations of this work BETA
Tom Stoneham (2011). Catching Berkeley's Shadow. Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (2):116-136.
Similar books and articles
George S. Pappas (1987). Berkeley and Immediate Perception. In Ernest Sosa (ed.), Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley. D. Reidel
Jay Newman, Martin A. Bertman & Finngeir Hiorth (1992). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] Philosophia 21 (3-4):339-349.
George Pappas (1999). Berkeley and Scepticism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (1):133 - 149.
Georges Dicker (1982). The Concept of Immediate Perception and Berkeley's Immaterialism. In Colin M. Turbayne (ed.), Berkeley: Critical and Interpretive Essays.
Michael Newman (1990). Book Review. [REVIEW] British Journal of Aesthetics 30 (4):390-392.
Goerge Pappas (1982). Berkeley, Perception, and Common Sense. In Colin M. Turbayne (ed.), Berkeley: Critical and Interpretive Essays. University of Minnesota Press
Kenneth L. Pearce (2008). The Semantics of Sense Perception in Berkeley. Religious Studies 44 (3):249-268.
Colin Murray Turbayne (ed.) (1982). Berkeley: Critical and Interpretive Essays. University of Minnesota Press.
Jody Graham (1997). Common Sense and Berkeley's Perception by Suggestion. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (3):397 – 423.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads41 ( #87,845 of 1,777,925 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #206,198 of 1,777,925 )
How can I increase my downloads?