David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Health Care Analysis 7 (2):131-137 (1999)
Medical criteria rooted in evidence-based medicine are often seen as a value-neutral âtrump cardâ which puts paid to any further debate about setting priorities for treatment. On this argument, doctors should stop providing treatment at the point when it becomes medically futile, and that is also the threshold at which the health purchaser should stop purchasing. This paper offers three kinds of ethical criteria as a counterweight to analysis based solely on medical criteria. The first set of arguments concerns futility, probability and utility; the second, justice and fairness; the third, consent and competence. The argument is illustrated by two recent case studies about futility and priority-setting: the US example of âBaby Ryanâ and the UK case of âChild Bâ
|Keywords||evidence-based medicine resource allocation medical futility justice informed consent|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Eric Gampel (2006). Does Professional Autonomy Protect Medical Futility Judgments? Bioethics 20 (2):92-104.
Similar books and articles
Daniel Callahan (1999). Shaping Biomedical Research Priorities: The Case of the National Institutes of Health. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 7 (2):115-129.
Lucy Frith (1999). Priority Setting and Evidence Based Purchasing. Health Care Analysis 7 (2):139-151.
Lindsay M. Sabik & Reidar K. Lie, Priority Setting in Health Care: Lessons From the Experiences of Eight Countries.
L. Kapiriri (2012). Priority Setting in Low Income Countries: The Roles and Legitimacy of Development Assistance Partners. Public Health Ethics 5 (1):67-80.
Doug Martin & Peter Singer (2003). A Strategy to Improve Priority Setting in Health Care Institutions. Health Care Analysis 11 (1):59-68.
Rui Nunes & Guilhermina Rego (2014). Priority Setting in Health Care: A Complementary Approach. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 22 (3):292-303.
K. S. Shrader-Frechette & E. D. Mccoy (1994). Biodiversity, Biological Uncertainty, and Setting Conservation Priorities. Biology and Philosophy 9 (2):167-195.
L. Ridderstolpe (2003). Priority Setting in Cardiac Surgery: A Survey of Decision Making and Ethical Issues. Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (6):353-358.
Michelle Clifton-Soderstrom (2003). Levinas and the Patient as Other: The Ethical Foundation of Medicine. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (4):447 – 460.
Kati Tusinski Berg (2012). The Ethics of Lobbying: Testing an Ethical Framework for Advocacy in Public Relations. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 27 (2):97 - 114.
Robert A. Pearlman (1992). An Ethical Framework for Rationing Health Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (1):79-96.
Amir Halevy (1995). Is Futility a Futile Concept? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (2):123-144.
Anders Nordgren (2012). Remote Monitoring or Close Encounters? Ethical Considerations in Priority Setting Regarding Telecare. Health Care Analysis (4):1-15.
Rogeer Hoedemaekers & Wija Oortwijn (2003). Problematic Notions in Dutch Health Care Package Decisions. Health Care Analysis 11 (4):287-294.
Rogeer Hoedemaekers & Wim Dekkers (2003). Key Concepts in Health Care Priority Setting. Health Care Analysis 11 (4):309-323.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads6 ( #206,947 of 1,102,856 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #297,281 of 1,102,856 )
How can I increase my downloads?