David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Developing World Bioethics 2 (1):55–63 (2002)
One effect of late capitalism – the commodification of practically everything – is to knock down the Chinese walls between the natural and productive realms, to use a Marxist framework. Women's labour in egg extraction and ‘surrogate’ motherhood might then be seen as what it is, labour which produces something of value. But this does not necessarily mean that women will benefit from the commodification of practically everything, in either North or South. In the newly developing biotechnologies involving stem cells, the reverse is more likely, particular given the shortage in the North of the egg donors who will be increasingly necessary to therapeutic cloning.Although most of the ethical debate has focused on the status of the embryo, this is to define ethics with no reference to global or gender justice. There has been little or no debate about possible exploitation of women, particularly of ovum donors from the South. Countries of the South without national ethics committees or guidelines may be particularly vulnerable: although there is increasing awareness of the susceptibility of poorer countries to abuses in research ethics, very little has been written about how they might be affected by the enormously profitable new technologies exploiting human tissue. Even in the UK, although the new Medical Research Council guidelines make a good deal of the ‘gift relationship’, what they are actually about is commodification. If donors believe they are demonstrating altruism, but biotechnology firms and researchers use the discourse of commodity and profit, we have not ‘incomplete commodification’ but complete commodification with a plausibly human face
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Shelley Tremain (2010). Biopower, Styles of Reasoning, and What's Still Missing From the Stem Cell Debates. Hypatia 25 (3):577 - 609.
Mi-Kyung Kim (2009). Oversight Framework Over Oocyte Procurement for Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer: Comparative Analysis of the Hwang Woo Suk Case Under South Korean Bioethics Law and U.S. Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (5):367-384.
Donna Dickenson (2006). Gender and Ethics Committees: Where's the 'Different Voice'? Bioethics 20 (3):115–124.
Donna Dickenson (2004). Consent, Commodification and Benefit‐Sharing in Genetic Research1. Developing World Bioethics 4 (2):109-124.
Rebecca Bamford (2011). Reconsidering Risk to Women: Oocyte Donation for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research. American Journal of Bioethics 11 (9):37-39.
Similar books and articles
Suzanne Holland (2001). Contested Commodities at Both Ends of Life: Buying and Selling Gametes, Embryos, and Body Tissues. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (3):263-284.
Merle Jacob (2009). On Commodification and the Governance of Academic Research. Minerva 47 (4):391-405.
Grant Gillett (2007). The Use of Human Tissue. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (2):119-127.
Alastair V. Campbell (2009). The Body in Bioethics. Routledge-Cavendish.
Crystal K. Liu (2007). 'Saviour Siblings'? The Distinction Between PGD with HLA Tissue Typing and Preimplantation HLA Tissue Typing. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (1):65-70.
Edmund D. Pellegrino (1999). The Commodification of Medical and Health Care: The Moral Consequences of a Paradigm Shift From a Professional to a Market Ethic. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (3):243 – 266.
A. Lucassen & J. Kaye (2006). Genetic Testing Without Consent: The Implications of the New Human Tissue Act 2004. Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (12):690-692.
Carolyn McLeod & Françoise Baylis (2006). Feminists on the Inalienability of Human Embryos. Hypatia 21 (1):1-14.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #141,418 of 1,707,731 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #352,634 of 1,707,731 )
How can I increase my downloads?