Philosophy of Science 71 (5):655-668 (2004)
|Abstract||Taking a cue from Bohr’s use of the notion of a reference frame in his reply to EPR’s argument against the completeness (and consistency) of standard quantum theory, this paper presents an analysis ofthe role of reference frames in the situation considered by EPR, using a quantum‐theoretical account of physical reference frames based on the work of Mackey, and Aharonov and Kaufherr. That analysis appears to justify at least some crucial aspects of a Bohrian reply to EPR.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Allen I. Janis (1969). Synchronism by Slow Transport of Clocks in Noninertial Frames of Reference. Philosophy of Science 36 (1):74-81.
Michael Dickson (2004). A View From Nowhere: Quantum Reference Frames and Uncertainty. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 35 (2):195-220.
Robert Deltete & Reed Guy (1991). Einstein and EPR. Philosophy of Science 58 (3):377-397.
Diederik Aerts, Ellie D'Hondt & Liane Gabora (2000). Why the Disjunction in Quantum Logic is Not Classical. .
Cord Friebe (2004). Teilen, Trennen Und Vereinen: EPR Ohne Holismus. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 35 (2):261 - 281.
Hans Halvorson & Rob Clifton (2002). Reconsidering Bohr's Reply to EPR. In T. Placek & J. Butterfield (eds.), Non-locality and Modality. Kluwer.
Hasok Chang & Nancy Cartwright (1993). Causality and Realism in the EPR Experiment. Erkenntnis 38 (2):169 - 190.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #123,218 of 549,571 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,571 )
How can I increase my downloads?