David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Research in Phenomenology 34 (1):73-102 (2004)
What is the difference between hermeneutics and deconstruction? This essay provides an answer by following the guiding thread of understanding that was already brought to the fore in Paris during the "improbable debate" between Gadamer and Derrida. Maybe there was and still is a "dialogue" between the two most important currents of continental philosophy, as Derrida suggests in his talk commemorating Gadamer at Heidelberg in 2002. It is a dialogue that passes through poetry, and above all the poems of Celan. In this way, the distance or the proximity between hermeneutics and deconstruction rests in the meaning of understanding: the one beginning from the uninterrupted dialogue, the other from the difference of interruption. Through a phenomenology of saying and of understanding, this essay asks at the same time how the differences of deconstruction are the stars necessary for the constellation of hermeneutics, and how the constellation is nevertheless necessary for every new star. It is perhaps the Schibboleth of Celan that indicates the point of orientation.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jonas Debesay, Dagfinn Nåden & Åshild Slettebø (2008). How Do We Close the Hermeneutic Circle? A Gadamerian Approach to Justification in Interpretation in Qualitative Studies. Nursing Inquiry 15 (1):57-66.
Similar books and articles
Robert J. Dostal (2008). Gadamerian Hermeneutics and Irony: Between Strauss and Derrida. Research in Phenomenology 38 (2):247-269.
Adrian Costache (2011). On the Philosophical Styles of the Times: Some Questions Concerning the Meaning of Deconstruction. Journal for Communication and Culture 1 (2):20-29.
A. T. Nuyen (1994). Interpretation and Understanding in Hermeneutics and Deconstruction. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24 (4):426-438.
Francisco J. Gonzalez (2006). Dialectic and Dialogue in the Hermeneutics of Paul Ricœur and H.G. Gadamer. Continental Philosophy Review 39 (3):313-345.
Hans-Georg Gadamer & Hugh J. Silverman (eds.) (1991). Gadamer and Hermeneutics. New York ;Routledge.
István M. Fehér (2001). Hermeneutics and Philology: “Understanding the Matter,” “Understanding the Text”. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 34 (3):269-285.
Eftichis Pirovolakis (2010). Reading Derrida and Ricoeur: Improbable Encounters Between Deconstruction and Hermeneutics. State University of New York Press.
I. I. I. Mootz, Gadamer's Rhetorical Conception of Hermeneutics as the Key to Developing a Critical Hermeneutics.
Stephen M. Feldman (2000). Made for Each Other: The Interdependence of Deconstruction and Philosophical Hermeneutics. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (1):51-70.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads33 ( #50,358 of 1,096,605 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #102,815 of 1,096,605 )
How can I increase my downloads?