Arne Naess and the Task of Gestalt Ontology

Environmental Ethics 28 (1):21-35 (2006)
While much of Arne Naess’s ecosophy underscores the importance of understanding one’s ecological Self, his analyses of gestaltism are significant in that they center less on questions of the self than on questions of nature and what is other-than-human. Rather than the realization of a more expansive Self, gestalt ontology calls for a “gestalt shift” in our thinking about nature, one that allows for its intrinsic value to emerge clearly. Taking such a gestalt shift as a central task enables Naess to avoid some common criticisms of his view
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/enviroethics200628137
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,914
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Christian Diehm (2004). Deep Ecology and Phenomenology. Environmental Philosophy 1 (2):20-27.
Ted Toadvine (2005). Gestalts and Refrains. Environmental Philosophy 2 (2):61-71.
Christian Diehm (2004). “Here I Stand”. Environmental Philosophy 1 (2):6-19.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

9 ( #246,340 of 1,725,607 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #167,236 of 1,725,607 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.