David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (2010)
Vagueness is a familiar but deeply puzzling aspect of the relation between language and the world. It is highly controversial what the nature of vagueness is -- a feature of the way we represent reality in language, or rather a feature of reality itself? May even relations like identity or parthood be affected by vagueness? Sorites arguments suggest that vague terms are either inconsistent or have a sharp boundary. The account we give of such paradoxes plays a pivotal role for our understanding of natural languages. If our reasoning involves any vague concepts, is it safe from contradiction? Do vague concepts really lack any sharp boundary? If not, why are we reluctant to accept the existence of any sharp boundary for them? And what rules of inference can we validly apply, if we reason in vague terms? Cuts and Clouds presents the latest work towards a clearer understanding of these old puzzles about the nature and logic of vagueness. The collection offers a stimulating series of original essays on these and related issues by some of the world's leading experts
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$66.51 used (51% off) $105.63 new (22% off) $135.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||B105.V33.C88 2010|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Monika Piotrowska (2012). Who Are My Parents? Why Assigning Moral Categories to Genealogical Relations Leads to More Confusion. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (9):28-30.
Similar books and articles
Cian Dorr (2009). Iterating Deﬁniteness. In Sebastiano Moruzzi & Richard Dietz (eds.), Cuts and Clouds. Vaguenesss, its Nature and its Logic. Oxford University Press.
Mark Colyvan (2001). Russell on Metaphysical Vagueness. Principia 5 (1-2):87-98.
Dennis Earl (2010). Vague Analysis. Metaphysica 11 (2):223-233.
Bertil RolF (1982). Russell's Theses on Vagueness. History and Philosophy of Logic 3 (1):69-83.
Diana Raffman (2009). Demoting Higher-Order Vagueness. In Sebastiano Moruzzi & Richard Dietz (eds.), Cuts and Clouds. Vaguenesss, its Nature and its Logic. Oxford University Press. 509--22.
Elia Zardini (2013). Higher-Order Sorites Paradox. Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (1):25-48.
Rosanna Keefe (2000). Theories of Vagueness. Cambridge University Press.
Crispin Wright (2009). The Illusion of Higher-Order Vagueness. In Richard Dietz & Sebastiano Moruzzi (eds.), Cuts and Clouds. Vaguenesss, its Nature and its Logic. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-09-15
Total downloads53 ( #36,823 of 1,679,387 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #39,503 of 1,679,387 )
How can I increase my downloads?