David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 179 (2):271 - 284 (2011)
This paper examines E. W. Beth's work in the philosophy of physics, both from a historical and a systematic point of view. Beth saw the philosophy of physics first of all as an opportunity to illustrate and promulgate a new and modern general approach to the philosophy of nature and to philosophy tout court: an approach characterized negatively by its rejection of all traditional metaphysics and positively by its firm orientation towards science. Beth was successful in defending this new ideology, and became its leading Dutch representative in the first two decades after the second world war. Beth also contributed importantly to the method of the philosophy of physics in a narrower sense, by proposing and promoting the semantic approach in the formal analysis of physical theories. Finally, he worked on several specific foundational questions; but he was probably too much of a logician to leave his mark in this area
|Keywords||Beth Philosophy of nature Philosophy of physics Logic Quantum mechanics Relativity|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Dennis Dieks (2006). Another Look at General Covariance and the Equivalence of Reference Frames. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 37 (1):174-191.
Alfred Tarski (1936). Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den Formalisierten Sprachen. Studia Philosophica 1:261--405.
Bas C. van Fraassen (1970). On the Extension of Beth's Semantics of Physical Theories. Philosophy of Science 37 (3):325-339.
E. W. Beth (1960). Semantics of Physical Theories. Synthese 12 (2-3):172 - 175.
Vittorio Somenzi (1969). La filosofia e la metodologia della scienza oggi in Italia. Man and World 2 (2):285-295.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Bas C. Van Fraassen (1970). On the Extension of Beth's Semantics of Physical Theories. Philosophy of Science 37 (3):325 - 339.
Eva Hoogland (2000). Algebraic Characterizations of Various Beth Definability Properties. Studia Logica 65 (1):91-112.
Miriam Franchella (1999). Evert Willem Beth's Scientific Philosophy. Grazer Philosophische Studien 57:221-236.
Achille C. Varzi (2005). Beth Too, but Only If. Analysis 65 (287):224–229.
Meinard Kuhlmann & Wolfgang Pietsch (2012). What Is and Why Do We Need Philosophy of Physics? Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (2):209-214.
Luca Bellotti (2007). Formalization, Syntax and the Standard Model of Arithmetic. Synthese 154 (2):199 - 229.
Henrik Zinkernagel (2011). Some Trends in the Philosophy of Physics. Theoria 26 (2):215-241.
Sadri Hassani (2010). From Atoms to Galaxies: A Conceptual Physics Approach to Scientific Awareness. Taylor & Francis.
Peter Kosso (1998). Appearance and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Physics. Oxford University Press.
M. Aiguier & F. Barbier (2007). An Institution-Independent Proof of the Beth Definability Theorem. Studia Logica 85 (3):333 - 359.
Finn V. Jensen (1974). Interpolation and Definability in Abstract Logics. Synthese 27 (1-2):251 - 257.
Michał Heller (1996). Filozofia fizyki przed nowym millenium. Filozofia Nauki 2.
Karl Rogers (2005). On the Metaphysics of Experimental Physics. Palgrave Macmillan.
Added to index2011-03-20
Total downloads66 ( #64,837 of 1,906,979 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #129,680 of 1,906,979 )
How can I increase my downloads?