David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Imagine a group that faces a decision problem but does not agree on which decision procedure is appropriate. In that case, can a decision be reached that respects the procedural concerns of the group? There is a sense in which legitimate decisions are possible even if people disagree on which procedure to use. I propose to decide in favour of an option which maximizes the number of persons whose judged-right procedure happens to entail this decision given the proﬁle. This decision rule is based not only on a proﬁle in the standard sense, but in addition on a proﬁle of judged-right procedures. To justify this decision rule, I present a set of simple axioms leading to it as the only solution.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Robert E. Goodin & Christian List (2006). A Conditional Defense of Plurality Rule: Generalizing May's Theorem in a Restricted Informational Environment. American Journal of Political Science 50 (4):940-949.
Noël Pauwels, Bartel van De Walle, Frank Hardeman & Karel Soudan (2000). The Implications of Irreversibility in Emergency Response Decisions. Theory and Decision 49 (1):25-51.
Paul Weirich (2001). Risk's Place in Decision Rules. Synthese 126 (3):427 - 441.
Rogeer Hoedemaekers & Wim Dekkers (2003). Justice and Solidarity in Priority Setting in Health Care. Health Care Analysis 11 (4):325-343.
Diego Gracia (2003). Ethical Case Deliberation and Decision Making. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (3):227-233.
Dorota Leszczyńska-Jasion (2009). A Loop-Free Decision Procedure for Modal Propositional Logics K4, S4 and S. Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (2):151 - 177.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #179,819 of 1,679,329 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #111,561 of 1,679,329 )
How can I increase my downloads?