I say tomato, you say domate:Differential reactions to English-only workplace policies by persons from immigrant and non-immigrantfamilies [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 52 (4):365 - 379 (2004)
Immigrants now compose approximately 12 of the population of the United States and a sizable proportion of the workforce. Yet in contrast to research on other traditionally under-represented groups (e.g., women, African Americans), there are relatively few studies on issues related to being an immigrant in the U.S. workforce. This study examined English-only workplace policies, focusing on reactions to business justifications – explanations that justify managerial decisions as business necessities – for these policies. We contrasted the reactions of individuals coming from immigrant families, where at least one parent was an immigrant to the U.S., with those of persons from non-immigrant families. Results of an experiment indicated that business justifications were successful in influencing the attitudes of non-immigrants toward the English-only policies, but did not influence the attitudes of individuals from immigrant families. Probing the reasons for this effect, a thought-listing protocol suggested that non-immigrants mentioned more of the business benefits of the English-only policy than did individuals from immigrant families. Further, business justifications for the English-only policy led individuals from immigrant families, but not those from non-immigrant families, to view the organization as being less ethical and less concerned with the welfare of its workers. The implications of messages from management being understood differently by different demographic groups are discussed.
|Keywords||Disclaimers English-only workplace policies Immigrants Social accounts|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Gerard H. Seijts (2002). Milking the Organization? The Effect of Breastfeeding Accommodation on Perceived Fairness and Organizational Attractiveness. Journal of Business Ethics 40 (1):1 - 13.
Citations of this work BETA
Joerg Dietz & Emmanuelle P. Kleinlogel (2013). Wage Cuts and Managers' Empathy: How a Positive Emotion Can Contribute to Positive Organizational Ethics in Difficult Times. Journal of Business Ethics 119 (4):1-12.
Similar books and articles
K. E. Supriya (1996). Confessionals, Testimonials: Women's Speech in/and Contexts of Violence. Hypatia 11 (4):92 - 106.
Jessica A. Folkart (2011). The Ethics of Spanish Identity and In-Difference. Philosophy and Literature 35 (2):216-232.
Duncan Mercieca (2010). On the Borders: The Arrival of Irregular Immigrants in Malta—Some Implications for Education. Ethics and Education 2 (2):145-157.
Gloria H. Albrecht (2003). How Friendly Are Family Friendly Policies? Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (2):177-192.
Ziad Swaidan, Scott J. Vitell, Gregory M. Rose & Faye W. Gilbert (2006). Consumer Ethics: The Role of Acculturation in U.S. Immigrant Populations. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 64 (1):1 - 16.
Uma Narayan (1995). "Male-Order" Brides: Immigrant Women, Domestic Violence and Immigration Law. Hypatia 10 (1):104 - 119.
Mihaela Robila (2010). Eastern European Immigrant Families. In Ann Brooks (ed.), Social Theory in Contemporary Asia. Routledge
Carl Anders Säfström (2010). The Immigrant has No Proper Name: The Disease of Consensual Democracy Within the Myth of Schooling. Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (5):606-617.
Patti Tamara Lenard (2010). What's Unique About Immigrant Protest? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (3):315 - 332.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads32 ( #118,814 of 1,789,835 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #105,284 of 1,789,835 )
How can I increase my downloads?