David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
If a group as a whole is modelled as a single Bayesian agent, what should its beliefs be? I propose an axiomatic model that connects group beliefs to beliefs of group members, who are themselves modelled as Bayesian agents, possibly with di¤erent priors and di¤erent information. Group beliefs are shown to take a simple multiplicative form if people’s information is independent, and a more complex form if information can overlap arbitrarily. This shows that group beliefs can incorporate all information spread over the individuals without the individuals having to communicate their (possibly complex and hard-to-describe) private information; communicating prior and posterior beliefs su¢ ces.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Giacomo Bonanno & Klaus Nehring (1999). How to Make Sense of the Common Prior Assumption Under Incomplete Information. International Journal of Game Theory 28 (3):409-434.
Margaret Gilbert (1987). Modelling Collective Belief. Synthese 73 (1):185-204.
Michael Baurmann (2007). Rational Fundamentalism? An Explanatory Model of Fundamentalist Beliefs. Episteme 4 (2):150-166.
Christian List, Christian Elsholtz & Thomas Seeley (2009). Independence and Interdependence in Collective Decision Making: An Agent-Based Model of Nest-Site Choice by Honey Bee Swarms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 364:755-762.
Deborah Tollefsen (2007). Group Testimony. Social Epistemology 21 (3):299 – 311.
Raimo Tuomela (1992). Group Beliefs. Synthese 91 (3):285-318.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #198,584 of 1,088,818 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,666 of 1,088,818 )
How can I increase my downloads?