David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of Science 55 (3):456-460 (1988)
N. Maxwell (1985) has claimed that special relativity and "probabilism" are incompatible; "probabilism" he defines as the doctrine that "the universe is such that, at any instant, there is only one past but many alternative possible futures". Thus defined, the doctrine is evidently prerelativistic as it depends on the notion of a universal instant of the universe. In this note I show, however, that there is a straightforward relativistic generalization, and that therefore Maxwell's conclusion that the special theory of relativity should be amended is unwarranted. I leave open the question whether or not probabilism (or the related doctrine of the flow of time) is true, but argue that the special theory of relativity has no fundamental significance for this question
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jos Uffink (2001). Bluff Your Way in the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 32 (3):305-394.
Mauro Dorato (2002). On Becoming, Cosmic Time and Rotating Universes. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 50:253-.
Mario Bacelar Valente (2016). Proper Time and the Clock Hypothesis in the Theory of Relativity. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 6 (2):191-207.
Petr Švarný (2015). Does Branching Explain Flow of Time or the Other Way Around? Synthese 192 (7):2273-2292.
Niko Strobach (2007). Fooling Around with Tenses. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 38 (3):653-672.
Similar books and articles
Laszlo E. Szabo (forthcoming). Lorentzian Theories Vs. Einsteinian Special Relativity - a Logico-Empiricist Reconstruction. In A. Maté, M. Rédei & F. Stadler (eds.), Vienna Circle and Hungary -- Veröffentlichungen des Instituts Wiener Kreis. Springer
Albert Shadowitz (1968). Special Relativity. Philadelphia, Saunders Co..
Howard Stein (1991). On Relativity Theory and Openness of the Future. Philosophy of Science 58 (2):147-167.
Nicholas Maxwell (1985). Are Probabilism and Special Relativity Incompatible? Philosophy of Science 52 (1):23-43.
Nicholas Maxwell (2006). Special Relativity, Time, Probabilism, and Ultimate Reality. In D. Dieks (ed.), The Ontology of Spacetime. Elsevier, B. V
Nicholas Maxwell (1993). On Relativity Theory and Openness of the Future. Philosophy of Science 60 (2):341-348.
Nicholas Maxwell (1988). Are Probabilism and Special Relativity Compatible? Philosophy of Science 55 (4):640-645.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #125,427 of 1,902,847 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #446,006 of 1,902,847 )
How can I increase my downloads?