Subvert the dominant paradigm!
| Abstract | We again press the case for computationalism by considering the latest in ill- conceived attacks on this foundational idea. We briefly but clearly define and delimit computationalism and then consider three authors from a new anti- computationalist collection. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
  |
| External links |
 Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesEric Dietrich (1999). Dynamic Systems and Paradise Regained, or How to Avoid Being a Calculator. [REVIEW] J. Of Experimental and Theoretical AI 11 (4):473-478.
Eric Dietrich (2001). It Does So: Review of The Mind Doesn't Work That Way: The Scope and Limits of Computational Psychology. [REVIEW] AI Magazine 22 (4):141-144.
Eric Dietrich (2001). It Does So: Review of Jerry Fodor, The Mind Doesn't Work That Way. [REVIEW] AI Magazine 22 (4):121-24.
Ugo Perone (2010). The Risks of The Present. Symposium 14 (2):19-34.
Laurence D. Houlgate (1962). The Paradigm‐Case Argument and 'Possible Doubt'1. Inquiry 5 (1-4):318-324.
Eric Dietrich (2001). It Does So. [REVIEW] AI Magazine 22 (4):141-144.
Paul M. Churchland (1987). How Parapsychology Could Become a Science. Inquiry 30 (3):227 – 239.
Eric Dietrich (1990). Computationalism. Social Epistemology 4 (2):135-154.
Eric Dietrich (2002). Subvert the Dominant Paradigm! [REVIEW] J. Of Experimental and Theoretical AI.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-03-31Total downloads57 ( #17,748 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)31 ( #1,747 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
