David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Logos Architekton 2 (2):35-58. (2008)
True contradictions are taken increasingly seriously by philosophers and logicians. Yet, the belief that contradictions are always false remains deeply intuitive. This paper confronts this belief head-on by explaining in detail how one specific contradiction is true. The contradiction in question derives from Priest's reworking of Berkeley's argument for idealism. However, technical aspects of the explanation offered here differ considerably from Priest's derivation. The explanation uses novel formal and epistemological tools to guide the reader through a valid argument with, not just true, but eminently acceptable premises, to an admittedly unusual conclusion: a true contradiction. The novel formal and epistemological tools concern points of view and changes in points of view. The result is an understanding of why the contradiction is true.
|Keywords||Nonclassical Logic Epistemology Metaphysics Points of View|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Graham Priest (2006). Doubt Truth to Be a Liar. Oxford University Press.
Jay Garfield & Graham Priest (2008). The Way of the Dialetheist: Contradictions in Buddhism. Philosophy East and West 58 (3):395 - 402.
Graham Priest (2006). In Contradiction: A Study of the Transconsistent. Oxford University Press.
Graham Priest (2000). Truth and Contradiction. Philosophical Quarterly 50 (200):305-319.
Greg Restall (2006). Laws of Non-Contradiction, Laws of the Excluded Middle, and Logics. In Graham Priest, J. C. Beall & Bradley Armour-Garb (eds.), The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays. Clarendon Press.
Greg Littmann (2012). Dialetheism and the Graphic Liar. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 42 (1):15-27.
Manuel Bremer (2007). Believing and Asserting Contradictions. Logique Et Analyse (200):341.
Patrick Allo (2010). A Classical Prejudice? Knowledge, Technology and Policy 23 (1-2):25-40.
Graham Priest (1982). To Be and Not to Be: Dialectical Tense Logic. Studia Logica 41 (2-3):249 - 268.
Vincent F. Hendricks & Stig Andur Pedersen (2006). Ways of Worlds I-II. Studia Logica 84 (2):167-169.
Jay L. Garfield & Graham Priest (2003). Nagarjuna and the Limits of Thought. Philosophy East and West 53 (1):1-21.
Rik Peels (2012). The New View on Ignorance Undefeated. Philosophia 40 (4):741-750.
Wenfang Wang (2011). Against Classical Dialetheism. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (3):492-500.
P. Eldridge-Smith (2011). Pinocchio Against the Dialetheists. Analysis 71 (2):306-308.
Added to index2011-02-20
Total downloads102 ( #10,442 of 1,098,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)19 ( #7,767 of 1,098,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?