David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Politics, Philosophy and Economics 9 (2):213-244 (2010)
How much inequality does market interaction generate? The answer to this question partly depends on the level of competition among economic agents. Yet, in their normative analysis of the market, theories of distributive justice focus on individual characteristics such as talents as determinants of income, and tend to ignore structural features such as competition. Economists, on the other hand, dispose of the conceptual tools to assess the distributive impact of competition, but their analysis is usually limited to allocative efficiency. Part I of the article distinguishes my argument from conventional perspectives on income inequality and redistribution. Whereas the latter propose either to redistribute income once the market interaction has taken place or to adjust the initial holdings of market participants, I focus on the distributive impact of the institutional structure of the market itself. Part II outlines the ways in which various forms of competition affect distribution. My objective here is descriptive in nature, but shows that a normative evaluation of the market has to take seriously the distributive impact of competition. This impact can be broken down into the analysis of three overlapping groups of economic agents, namely consumers, workers, and capital owners. Consumers potentially gain from competition in the form of lower prices, but these gains are only realized if competition does not put pressure on their work income at the same time. Unless competition squeezes profits unusually hard, capital owners tend to benefit from competition
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Lisa Herzog (2014). Adam Smith on Markets and Justice. Philosophy Compass 9 (12):864-875.
Lisa Herzog (2015). Capitalism, but Better? Res Publica 21 (1):99-103.
Pierre-Yves Néron (2015). Rethinking the Very Idea of Egalitarian Markets and Corporations: Why Relationships Might Matter More Than Distribution. Business Ethics Quarterly 25 (1):93-124.
Similar books and articles
P. H. Sedgwick (1999). The Market Economy and Christian Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Gwen Coates & Nick Adnett (2003). Encouraging Cream-Skimming and Dreg-Siphoning? Increasing Competition Between English HEIs. British Journal of Educational Studies 51 (3):202 - 218.
Jason Sorens (2000). The Failure to Converge: Why Globalization Doesn't Cause Deregulation. Critical Review 14 (1):19-33.
Giacomo Bonanno (1998). Intensity of Competition and the Choice Between Product and Process Innovation. International Journal of Industrial Organization 16 (4):495-510.
Yehoshua Liebermann (1985). Competition in Consumption as Viewed by Jewish Law. Journal of Business Ethics 4 (5):385 - 393.
Deborah Walker, Jerry W. Dauterive, Elyssa Schultz & Walter Block (2004). The Feminist Competition/Cooperation Dichotomy. Journal of Business Ethics 55 (3):243 - 254.
Added to index2010-04-24
Total downloads68 ( #62,825 of 1,906,946 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #200,756 of 1,906,946 )
How can I increase my downloads?