David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):884-885 (2001)
The theory of event coding by Hommel et al. proposes that feature binding is a central component of action planning. To evaluate the binding hypothesis, we consider findings from studies of action-perception interference and bimanual movements. We argue that although binding of action features may be a valuable concept, interference from partial feature overlap does not provide a parsimonious account for the observed phenomena.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Hubert Zimmer, Axel Mecklinger & Ulman Lindenberger (eds.) (2006). Handbook of Binding and Memory: Perspectives From Cognitive Neuroscience. OUP Oxford.
Robert F. Hadley (2006). Neural Circuits, Matrices, and Conjunctive Binding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (1):80-80.
James W. Garson (2001). (Dis)Solving the Binding Problem. Philosophical Psychology 14 (4):381 – 392.
Adina L. Roskies (1999). The Binding Problem. Neuron 24:7--9.
Glyn Humphreys (2012). There's Binding and There's Binding, or is There Just Binding? : Neuropsychological Insights From Bálint's Syndrome. In Jeremy M. Wolfe & Lynn C. Robertson (eds.), From Perception to Consciousness: Searching with Anne Treisman. Oxford University Press 324.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #359,010 of 1,724,747 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #349,121 of 1,724,747 )
How can I increase my downloads?