Evidence
Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2007)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | explanation probability probabilistic deductive reasoning ravens paradox bayesian grue paradox underdetermination holism | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRobert J. Levy (1992). Another Day for an Old Dogma. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:131 - 141.
Norman Swartz (1973). Absolute Probability in Small Worlds: A New Paradox in Probability Theory. Philosophia 3 (2-3):167-178.
Branden Fitelson (2008). Goodman's “New Riddle”. Journal of Philosophical Logic 37 (6).
Florian F. Schiller (2012). Why Bayesians Needn't Be Afraid of Observing Many Non-Black Non-Ravens. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 43 (1):77-88.
Mark Siebel (2004). Der Rabe Und der Bayesianist. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 35 (2):313 - 329.
Malcolm R. Forster (1994). Non-Bayesian Foundations for Statistical Estimation, Prediction, and the Ravens Example. Erkenntnis 40 (3):357 - 376.
Roger Clarke (2010). “The Ravens Paradox” is a Misnomer. Synthese 175 (3):427-440.
Branden Fitelson & James Hawthorne (2010). How Bayesian Confirmation Theory Handles the Paradox of the Ravens. In Ellery Eells & James Fetzer (eds.), The Place of Probability in Science. Springer.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads41 ( #28,500 of 556,840 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,840 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
