Love and War: How Militarism Shapes Sexuality and Romance

Cambridge University Press (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ideas of masculinity and femininity become sharply defined in war-reliant societies, resulting in a presumed enmity between men and women. This so-called "battle of the sexes" is intensified by the use of misogyny to encourage men and boys to conform to the demands of masculinity. These are among Tom Digby's fascinating insights shared in _Love and War_, which describes the making and manipulation of gender in militaristic societies and the sweeping consequences for men and women in their personal, romantic, sexual, and professional lives. Drawing on cross-cultural comparisons and examples from popular media, including sports culture, the rise of "gonzo" and "bangbus" pornography, and "internet trolls," Digby describes how the hatred of women and the suppression of empathy are used to define masculinity, thereby undermining relations between women and men--sometimes even to the extent of violence. Employing diverse philosophical methodologies, he identifies the cultural elements that contribute to heterosexual antagonism, such as an enduring faith in male force to solve problems, the glorification of violent men who suppress caring emotions, the devaluation of men's physical and emotional lives, an imaginary gender binary, male privilege premised on the subordination of women, and the use of misogyny to encourage masculine behavior. Digby tracks the "collateral damage" of this disabling misogyny in the lives of both men and women, but ends on a hopeful note. He ultimately finds the link between war and gender to be dissolving in many societies: war is becoming slowly de-gendered, and gender is becoming slowly de-militarized

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Male aggression against women.Barbara Smuts - 1992 - Human Nature 3 (1):1-44.
Gender, Sexuality, and Sport in America. [REVIEW]A. Schneider - 1995 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 22 (1).
Loose Women, Lecherous Men: A Feminist Philosophy of Sex.Linda LeMoncheck - 1997 - New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.
Loose women, lecherous men: A feminist philosophy of sex.Linda Lemoncheck - 1998 - Philosophical Studies 89 (2-3):369-373.
Being and Playing: Sport and the Valorisation of Gender.Leslie A. Howe - 2007 - In William J. Morgan (ed.), Ethics in Sport. Human Kinetics. pp. 331.
Argument. Why Should We Study Everyday Lives of Catholic Women.Mihai Lucaciu - 2003 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 2 (6):108-116.
Women's Ethics in Love and Romance.Dong Junsheng - 1995 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 27 (1):4-26.
Real men.Hugh LaFollette - 1992 - In Larry May & Robert Strikwerda (eds.), Masculinity. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 59--74.
The nature of love.Irving Singer - 1966 - New York,: Random House.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-28

Downloads
15 (#919,495)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tom Digby
Springfield College

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references