Ariadne revisited

Abstract
ABSTRACT My article, "Ariadne at the Movies," provided a detailed, double film counter-example to the claim that films are types. Here I defend my views against various criticisms provided by Aaron Smuts. The defense includes some necessary clarification of the Ariadne article's broader theoretical structure and background, as well as some additional anti-type arguments to further withstand his criticisms.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive John Dilworth, Ariadne revisited
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
John Dilworth (2007). In Support of Content Theories of Art. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (1):19 – 39.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Angus Easson (1969). The Source of Titian's Bacchus and Ariadne. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 32:396-397.
John Dilworth (2003). Ariadne at the Movies. Contemporary Aesthetics 1 (1).

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

56 ( #80,041 of 1,934,372 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #91,718 of 1,934,372 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.