Ariadne revisited

Contemporary Aesthetics 1 (1):Online (2003)
Abstract
ABSTRACT My article, "Ariadne at the Movies," provided a detailed, double film counter-example to the claim that films are types. Here I defend my views against various criticisms provided by Aaron Smuts. The defense includes some necessary clarification of the Ariadne article's broader theoretical structure and background, as well as some additional anti-type arguments to further withstand his criticisms.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,273
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
John Dilworth (2007). In Support of Content Theories of Art. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (1):19 – 39.
Similar books and articles
Angus Easson (1969). The Source of Titian's Bacchus and Ariadne. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 32:396-397.
John Dilworth (2003). Ariadne at the Movies. Contemporary Aesthetics 1 (1).
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

9 ( #147,458 of 1,096,298 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #84,313 of 1,096,298 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.