On Critical and Pancritical Rationalism

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (2):127-156 (2013)
Abstract
Bartley’s pancritical rationalism is seen by some as being a refinement of Popper’s critical rationalism. I contest this view and argue that pancritical rationalism is obtained from critical rationalism by removing some of its most important and useful features. The remainder consists of a restatement of some of Popper’s key ideas and an interpretation of others that I attempt to show is not entirely faithful to what Popper says
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Nikos Psarros (1997). Critical Rationalism in the Test Tube? Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 28 (2):297 - 305.
    Stephen P. Stich (1979). Between Chomskian Rationalism and Popperian Empiricism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (December):329-47.
    Jack Birner (forthcoming). Popper and Hayek on Reason and Tradition. Philosophy of the Social Sciences:0048393112452793.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2012-03-24

    Total downloads

    13 ( #100,552 of 1,088,905 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    4 ( #24,210 of 1,088,905 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.