David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (1):39-56 (2003)
Issues concerning the spatial orientation of pictures play an important, though previously neglected, role in an adequate understanding of the nature and identity of visual artworks and other pictures. Using a previous contrast ('Artworks Versus Designs', BJA Vol. 41, No. 4, October 2001), I show that differing orientations of a design naturally give rise to distinct pictures, which may be appropriated as distinct artworks by a discerning artist--which also shows that such artworks cannot be types, since they share a common token. The investigation also raises some significant issues concerning artistic printmaking, and strongly suggests in addition that two new concepts of interpretation--of identifying and constitutive interpretation--are required to adequately explain the artistic phenomena that are uncovered.
|Keywords||Spatial orientation of pictures Printmaking Identifying Interpretation Constitutive Interpretation Contra Artistic Type Theories|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Sherri Irvin (2005). The Artist's Sanction in Contemporary Art. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (4):315–326.
Similar books and articles
Robert Hopkins (2000). Touching Pictures. British Journal of Aesthetics 40 (1):149-167.
John Dilworth (2008). The Abstractness of Artworks and Its Implications for Aesthetics. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (4):341-353.
James Shelley (2002). The Character and Role of Principles in the Evaluation of Art. British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (1):37-51.
Aaron Smuts (2003). Multiple Inheritance and Film Identity: A Reply to Dilworth. Contemporary Aesthetics 1:1-3.
Katerina Bantinaki (2007). Pictorial Perception as Illusion. British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (3):268-279.
John Dilworth (2005). A Double Content Theory of Artistic Representation. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (3):249–260.
John Dilworth (2001). Artworks Versus Designs. British Journal of Aesthetics 41 (2):162-177.
Dominic Gregory (2010). Pictures, Pictorial Contents and Vision. British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (1):15-32.
John Dilworth (2007). In Support of Content Theories of Art. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (1):19 – 39.
H. J. Pratt (2012). Categories and Comparisons of Artworks. British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (1):45-59.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads39 ( #100,507 of 1,789,999 )
Recent downloads (6 months)16 ( #50,580 of 1,789,999 )
How can I increase my downloads?