Representation as epistemic identification

Philo 9 (1):12-31 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a previous Philo article, it was shown how properties could be ontologically dispensed with via a representational analysis: to be an X is to comprehensively represent all the properties of an X. The current paper extends that representationalist (RT) theory by explaining representation itself in parallel epistemic rather than ontological terms. On this extended RT (ERT) theory, representations of X, as well as the real X, both may be identified as providing information about X, whether partial or comprehensive. But that information does not match ontological, property-based analyses of X, so it is epistemically fundamental–hence supporting a broadly conceptualist rather than nominalist metaphysics.

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
668 (#24,128)

6 months
93 (#44,494)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Dilworth
Western Michigan University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Biosemantics.Ruth Millikan - 1989 - Journal of Philosophy 86 (6):281--297.
Biosemantics.Ruth Garrett Millikan - 1989 - Journal of Philosophy 86 (July):281-97.
Supervenience and Object-Dependant Properties.Thomas Hofweber - 2005 - Journal of Philosophy 102 (1):5-32.
Representation and indication.Robert C. Cummins & Pierre Poirier - 2004 - In Hugh Clapin (ed.), Representation in Mind. Elsevier. pp. 21--40.

Add more references