Scientific Progress: A Study Concerning the Nature of the Relation Between Successive Scientific Theories
Kluwer Academic (1994)
| Abstract | In this way Dilworth succeeds in providing a conception of science in which scientific progress is based on both rational and empirical considerations. | |||||||||
| Keywords | Science Philosophy Science Methodology | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Buy the book | $69.99 direct from Amazon Amazon page | |||||||||
| Call number | Q175.D6342 1994 | |||||||||
| ISBN(s) | 0792324870 1402091087 1402063539 9781402063534 | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJames A. Marcum (2011). Horizon for Scientific Practice: Scientific Discovery and Progress. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):187-215.
Ingo Brigandt & Alan Love, Reductionism in Biology. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Jonathan Y. Tsou (2006). Genetic Epistemology and Piaget's Philosophy of Science: Piaget Vs. Kuhn on Scientific Progress. Theory and Psychology 16 (2):203-224.
Paul M. Quay (1974). Progress as a Demarcation Criterion for the Sciences. Philosophy of Science 41 (2):154-170.
Howard Sankey (2000). Methodological Pluralism, Normative Naturalism and the Realist Aim of Science. In Howard Sankey & Robert Nola (eds.), After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend: Recent Issues in Theories of Scientific Method.
Anthony O'Hear (1989). Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads23 ( #54,659 of 556,773 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #38,924 of 556,773 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
