Graduate studies at Western
British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (2):115-144 (2008)
|Abstract||It is generally accepted that Picasso might have used a different canvas as the vehicle for his painting Guernica, and also that the artwork Guernica itself necessarily represents a certain historical episode—rather than, say, a bowl of fruit. I argue that such a conjunctive acceptance entails a broadly propositional view of the nature of representational artworks. In addition, I argue—via a comprehensive examination of possible alternatives—that, perhaps surprisingly, there simply is no other available conjunctive view of the nature of representational artworks in general. CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John Dilworth (2003). Pictorial Orientation Matters. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (1):39-56.
Peter Kivy (2002). Intentional Forgeries and Accidental Versions: A Response to John Dilworth. British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (4):419-422.
John Dilworth (2001). A Representational Theory of Artefacts and Artworks. British Journal of Aesthetics 41 (4):353-370.
Fiona Macpherson (2005). Colour Inversion Problems for Representationalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1):127-152.
Brian Laetz (2010). Kendall Walton's 'Categories of Art': A Critical Commentary. British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (3):287-306.
Sherri Irvin (2004). Artworks and Representational Properties. Dialogue 43 (4):627-644.
John Dilworth (2008). The Abstractness of Artworks and Its Implications for Aesthetics. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (4):341-353.
John Dilworth (2005). The Double Content of Art. Prometheus Books.
John Dilworth (2007). In Support of Content Theories of Art. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (1):19 – 39.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #71,344 of 739,667 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,667 )
How can I increase my downloads?